To fully realize the impact of Google Fred when it was released, this Searchmetrics post comprehensively covers its winners and losers.
Crazy right? It seems like Google really hates reddit.
As mentioned earlier, the purpose of the algo update was to bring down sites that didn’t provide value. Either they had thin content with a lot of ads or they used black hat SEO techniques to raise their site’s rankings.
Now, if that’s the case, then why did sites like Reddit, Tumblr, and Pinterest suffer?
Keep in mind, these popular websites offer lots of value and engagement to users.
So, if poor content is one of the main causes of the decrease in search rankings, then it doesn’t necessarily follow here.
If we check on Reddit’s metrics using Ahrefs, it doesn’t seem like it took a major loss in terms of organic traffic:
Does that make the Searchmetrics post incorrect?
Not really.
There are many metrics that go into determining whether or not a site is ‘hit’ or ‘not hit’ by an algo update.
However, one thing is clear about Google:
There is no clear-cut answer that explains why sites rose or dropped on the SERPs.
However, I’ll try to at least make sense of the chaos that Google Fred cast upon us.
Let’s start with Reference.com, a Q&A site that lost almost
100% of its organic search traffic no thanks to Fred.
The site was knocking on almost 30 million visitors a month when Google Fred kicked in.
Then the site experienced a huge drop in traffic between April and June of 2017. Since then, its traffic never recovered beyond 2 million hits.
Ouch.
So why did it drop that hard?
Using Wayback Machine, let’s check out what their site looks like in 2017 (March 10, to be exact):
Just by looking at the site, it doesn’t look
spammy, i.e.
there are no ads that hog the screen.
However, when you look at their pages, things appear a bit more interesting to say the least…
Here’s the content to the question, “Do dogs have taste buds:”
Two things immediately spring to mind:
- It’s too short. While it does answer the question, it’s probably not enough to justify having a single page with this amount of content in it.
- It’s not unique. The answer redirects readers to the Psychology Today post that fully answers the question.
Therefore, we can conclude that Google penalized Reference.com due to
thin content!
Now that we’ve analyzed a site that suffered due to Google Fred, let’s look at one that increased its search rankings tremendously.
Dictionary and encyclopedia sites are the biggest beneficiaries of Google Fred. Five of the top tens sites that sky-rocketed their organic traffic are of this niche.
It’s interesting to see that sites like Merriam Webster gained lots of foothold in Google search even though it’s “just” a dictionary site.
It was generating 69 million visitors a month in March of 2017. Nowadays, it’s hovering above 74 million!
So what changed?
Unlike other dictionary sites, Merriam Webster has a wealth of unique content to offer visitors.
The Videos, Word Games, and Editor’s Pick section of the site was more than enough to keep wordsmiths busy.
So, the site doesn’t only give out the meaning of a word; it also offers value to visitors looking for more than just the word of the day!